New rules are causing more pain | Addiction Professional Magazine Skip to content Skip to navigation

New rules are causing more pain

May 21, 2018
by Roland Reeves, MD
| Reprints

Fewer than 5,000 people died of drug overdoses in 1988, while more than 64,000 died last year. The seeds of this epidemic were sown and fertilized by a massive increase in the use of prescription pain medications. Four percent of the world’s population lives in the United States, yet we are using over 80% of the world’s pain medication. We do not hurt more than the rest of the world. We are just given a lot more opioids. How did we get here?

Recognizing the problem, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revised guidelines for the prescribing of opioids for chronic pain. These recommendations are causing much consternation among prescribers, and outright fear among many chronic pain patients. Providers are wondering what to do with the many patients they care for who currently are on doses of opioids that exceed what the CDC has now listed as a dangerous amount. These patients are feeling fearful and even betrayed at the prospect of not receiving their usual pain medicine prescription. Any patient who is on regular opioid medications knows full well the discomfort of missing or even decreasing a dose. This quickly leads to major symptoms and pain.

When it comes to pain medications, pharmaceutical companies, the media and healthcare providers had been leading us to believe that any pain should be treated with whatever amount of opioids it takes for relief, and and that there was no unsafe amount. Pain has been construed as this evil thing that only a mean and uncaring person, facility or payer would ever suggest should be treated with anything less than complete relief. This is a principle that has been taught or implied in medical training for many years, and it has shaped the expectations of patients and families. Now, suddenly it seems the message is different.

I had an angry patient in my office the other day asking, “Why do I have to suffer just because those drug addicts are dying?” She had been referred to me after being told by her physician that he was no longer allowed by his employer to prescribe the amount of pain medication he had been giving her for years, and that she “needed to go see a detox doctor.” She has been taking over 600 morphine milligram equivalents per day, and she had been taught that this was safe. Pulling the rug out from under someone hurts. Even if the rug is on fire.

Prior to 1980, strong opioid pain medications were used primarily for cancer pain. In 1980, a letter published in the New England Journal of Medicine stated that opioids would lead to problems in less than 1% of people if used for medical reasons. This single publication, based on bad science, had a major impact on how our country uses pain medicine. This (dis)information has been used with great “success” by those that market the drugs. Now we know this letter was dead wrong, pun intended. It opened the door for the use of pain medications for any and all pain. It became accepted that there is no limit to how much pain medicine could be safely prescribed. A crusty surgeon who was one of my early mentors used to say, “Never let facts stand in the way of dogma, that’s just how it’s done.” Pain medicine prescribing succumbed to dogma.


The Summits for Clinical Excellence bring together thought leaders on cutting-edge topics in multi-day national and regional conferences. Summits on mindfulness, trauma, process addiction, and shame appeal particularly to private practice behavioral healthcare professionals. Other Summits address the national opioid crisis from a regional perspective and engage a diverse group of stakeholders.

June 25-26, 2018 Pittsburgh — The Opioid Crisis: The Clinician's Role and Treatment Practices


Roland Reeves MD

Physician, T R Reeves


Roland Reeves, MD, provides medication assisted treatment for the practice T R Reeves, MD, in...

The opinions expressed by Addiction Professional bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone and are not meant to reflect the opinions of the publication.